data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90321/903216300017933fc16b25d474802d4840beef76" alt=""
Just think back to Ignatieff'sface on the night of the final ballot, this was not the face of a man ready to back down gracefully.
He is unhappy and to tell the truth probably also frustrated with Dion's progressive-wing decisions and policies. He believes that the progressive left is not where he wants the Liberal party to be and wants to pull it in his own direction. He sees votes and power in his tunnel vision and will ignore where Dion's votes and power lie. Ignatieff is not a progressive and taht's why he lost the leadership to Dion in the first place.
Right now he is doing all he can to undermine Dion's authority and leadership, on camera whenever he can manage, always answering "My feelings" "My opinion" "I" "I" "I" rather than "Mr. Dion feels" or "Stephane Dion" or "our" or "the Liberal Party". By making Canada believe he is the "true" leader of the party he will raise his own polling and opinions about him until the next leadership race makes enough Liberals think "This guy is who Canadians like and trust and respect, we should go with him".
It is understandable, to be sure, that he might want to prepare himself for the future, but at what cost is what I ask. By sacrificing party unity? By undermining his own leader, whom voters must come to know and trust in order to secure votes? By upstaging Stephane Dion?
As an actor, no one likes a bit pplayer to steal the scene to make himself look good. That is how a good show works, with cast unity. It doesn't matter if you are the bit player or the lead, a trained and respectful actor KNOWS that the show will not come off too good if someone is trying to steal the focus for their own insecurities. That is a lesson that our Party must learn if our show is to go on.